![]() |
NASA's Policy of Secrecy |
NASA have long been fond of telling the world that they are an open civilian agency. We have all heard this claim, and most have never had reason to doubt it. They have been caught being less than candid on more than one occasion. There is even an internal NASA document detailing how to avoid telling the truth to the public. (Hiding Space: NASA's tips for Avoiding Scrutiny, by Kate Doyle) This page has been removed from the internet. Link now dead...see for yourself. Below is yet another example of NASA's policy of continuing secrecy on many levels. This document outlines the NASA plan for concealing evidence, and preventing eyewitness testimony, concerning any possible future accident (Known in bureaucratic circles as a contingency) aboard the International Space Station. This plan goes so far as to post armed guards at the doors to the building, and to suspend rubbish collectiion. If this supposedly open civilian agency will go to such lengths to cover up even a SUSPECTED contingency, what would they do with a UFO incident? Read the official document below for a picture of just how secretive NASA really is. These secrecy rules were implemented during the tragic loss of Space Shuttle Columbia on 1 February, 2003. I observed the procedure, and cannot see how keeping everything pertaining to the disaster from the eyes of the public does anyone any good. As the facts were meted out little by little over the ensuing months, one had to wonder how much of it was the actual truth.
JEFF CHALLENDER |
||
ISS
MER Contingency
Response ProcedureDefinition • Per SSP 50190, ISS Program Contingency Action Plan for Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, a contingency is defined as:
When
the event occurs…. •
Highest Priority of the ISS MER and ESRs is to support the ISS FCT with
analysis and corrective actions to minimize the impact to human life
and the ISS •
Official Management Notification CDC
Content |
||
This was sent to me in the form of an MS Word document. It was obtained from a NASA employee who shall remain nameless for his/her protection. This policy was followed to the letter on 1 February 2003 when the STS-107 Flight Director realized that he had a contingency on his hands when Columbia stopped communicating. Moments later, it was confirmed that Columbia was destroyed during the later stages of re-entry... |
||