Pdx

In every UFO case where "hard" evidence is reported, the military have cordoned off the area and removed everything. This pattern dates back to at least 1947, the Roswell Case.

The government denies the existence of these unknowns, and skeptics do likewise, based on the lack of "hard" evidence. So herein lies the Paradox.

If "hard" evidence exists, it is in the hands of those officials who deny it's existence.

A good friend of mine brought the October 1999 "crash" incident in Guyra, NSW, Australia to my attention in December,1999 The early reports suggested the there might actually be "hard" evidence of a UFO crash.

As per usual, in came the authorities, who sealed off the area. Military personell arrived and, in a matter of hours, removed everything. The public was given a story that the object was only a golfball sized meteorite. Where is the "hard" evidence for this? Where is the meteorite? If this was just a little meteorite, why the strict secrecy and cordon? Why was the military called in then? Why didn't scientists recover the object? Why was the news media kept away? I'm not claiming the object wasn't a meteorite. I'm not in a position to know that. It's just that the whole affair reeks of coverup. There are just so many unanswered questions. I AM saying that IF this object WAS "something else", the world won't be told about it.

To challenge the official line on any UFO case is inviting derision, ridicule, and a demand for "hard" evidence. But, you see, any "hard" evidence is rapidly scooped up, and held incognito by those who put out the official explanation. Catch 22, round and round.

A True Paradox.

The Big Three

The Big Three. These are what I call the standard government "explanations" for ALL reports of UFO phenomenon. It doesn't matter if these reports come from you, me, the most experienced military aviators, or even Astronauts and Cosmonauts. It's always the same three things.

1) He/She/They were intoxicated.

2) He/She/They are lying or hoaxing.

3) He/She/They are just too stupid to identify something seen every day.

If these three "explanations" are all we have really been dealing with for all these years, then why do the authorities care enough to work so hard to discredit UFO reports? And why work so hard to discredit the millions, from all over the globe, who make those reports?

So if the Big Three apply to EVERY SINGLE CASE since, at least 1947, why such AGRESSIVE secrecy?

Suppose this agressive secrecy has the purpose of protecting top secret military projects. Then why are these secret operational tests being done in plain sight of millions of witnesses worldwide? And what about the safety question? Experimental aircraft frequently crash. Why would such risks be taken in the skies over populated areas? There are already special places set aside for miliary testing, far away from the public. Why would the military be "testing" the same machines for well over 50 years? The reported behaviour of these vehicles suggests that they are more than perfected.

If one asks these questions expecting answers, don't hold your breath waiting for them to come from government