Ch38-2

Chemtrails Over Sacramento

With "Fallout"!

13 November 2005 - North Highlands, CA.

Page 2

Clifford E. Carnicom's DVD "Aerosol Crimes"

DVDs Now Available At Project P.R.O.V.E.!

The microscope used is an Intel-Play QX3 USB instrument. It is powered by the PC it is connected to. There are three magnification settings, and the lighting can be shone from bottom or top. The brightness of the light is adjustable to low, medium, and high.

I did the best I could, not being a professional scientist. This is only a gross visual examination, as we have no facilities for a chemical analysis of the substance. What we do know is that when this material breaks down, and "melts", it creates a very noxious gas. This gas is a strong irritant to eyes and lungs. Furthermore, it leaves a very unpleasant metallic taste on the tongue.

So, without any more chatter on my part, here are the photos. They are grouped by magnification and light settings.

THE MICROSCOPE PHOTOS

SETTING ONE - 10X

TOP LIGHTING

	#1. The stuff appears to be white, and cotton like. It seemed to be a series of strands at varying thickness. All four of these taken at the "high" illumination setting.

	#2. The examination chamber has been rotated for a different perspective. The main "clump" is quite dense. This may be due to my stuffing it into the examination chamber. However, I did not cause some of the fibers to form into thicker "ropes". The material did this on its way down from the sky.

	#3. Rotated once again.

	#4. A look at the wispiest part of the sample. As can be seen, some of the fibers are very delicate.

SETTING ONE - 10X

BOTTOM LIGHTING

	#5. Lighting shifted to the bottom. Now the fibrous nature of the material becomes more defined. This picture taken at low light setting.

	#6. Medium light setting. Note that light does not pass through the heaviest part of the sample very well. There are visible contaminants in the sample. These are due to the fact that it was collected using sticks and twigs found about the area, and because the sample was pulled from trees, shrubs, and grass.

	#7. Same view, but with the lighting on high setting.

SETTING TWO - 60X

TOP LIGHTING

	#8. Now we graduate to 60 magnifications. Although focus isn't the best, we begin to see the component fibers in the material. The entire sample is composed of these tiny fibers which "melt" or "evaporate" when exposed to open air and warmth for any period of time. Also note that there is a pinkish tint to some of this material.

	#9. I selected this view after casting about, because we can now see the structure of the material to good advantage. This is on the low light setting.

	#10. Same view, medium light.

	#11. High light setting. I find this substance to be a bit scary myself. What kind of chemical appears as a fiber, but behaves like some sort of volatile crystal?

SETTING TWO - 60X

BOTTOM LIGHTING

	#12. This is the same view as in the final three with top lighting. The light was shifted back to the bottom shining up. This is the low setting.

	#13. Same again, on medium light.

	#14. Final look at this spot, on high light setting.

	#15. A closer look at a thicker part of the sample. Light doesn't pass through this stuff very well, but we can see that the fibrous structure remains throughout the material.

	#16. Same view, medium light.

	#17. On high setting, the light does a better job. The tiny filaments in the sample begin to show up very well.

	#18. This may be the worst of the 60x photos. Focus is bad, and there isn't much which can be determined.

	#19. Last of the 60x images. The areas where the material has become woven together almost resemble small wooden sticks, but are not. The material is just more "ropelike" in these areas. Also, some of the dirt contaminating the sample is fairly obvious here as well.

SETTING THREE - 200X

TOP LIGHTING

#20. As you can see, the 200x setting did not work out very well with top lighting. We CAN see the intricate structure of the fibers, but the poor focus doesn't reveal much else.

#21. I tried very hard in this picture to get a look at the smallest of the structures which make up the sample.

This is the best I could do. The microscope just would not focus well at 200x.

SETTING THREE - 200X

BOTTOM LIGHTING

	#22. Bottom lighting worked better at 200x. Note the contaminant in the upper right corner. I tried to focus on just a portion of this 3D material.

	#23. Now we have refocused on the same spot getting detail on a different layer. This microscope has a very limited depth of field at high magnification. The bit of dirt in the upper left is more prominent in this shot.

	#24. The best look I can give you of the very edge of the sample. Note how fine and delicate the fibers are in this frame.

	#25. This is the final picture. Did what I could to try to get various parts of the sample into focus at 200x. I am not sure why the colors of the fibers seems to differ from one place to the next. This would have to be determined by someone with more experience with such things.

Wish I could tell you WHAT this stuff is made of. But that will have to wait until the EPA, or some other responsible body, decides to shed its obstinancy and take this phenomenon seriously.

In conclusion, the substance which fell over North Highlands, California on 13 November at approximately 3:00 PM PST (23:00 GMT) remains unknown in composition. We know that it changes from solid to gas at ambient temperature in the open air. We know that the gas is a strong irritant to human beings. We strongly suspect that contact with the skin can cause an itchy rash, requiring medical attention. We know that when rubbed between the fingers it feels waxy, or oily as it dissolves. We know that it is white, and made up of increasingly tiny fibers as shown under the microscope.

This is not the first case of a physical substance falling from the sky after chem-trails have been laid. There are other cases of this happening. We have been collaborating with Mr. Clifford Carnicom of Colorado on this instance. It is hoped that some positive result will come of it all.

In the end, it was a frightening experience. I am not at all sure there will not be long term effects from my, and my family's, close up exposure to this stuff. We can only speculate on the purpose behind this phenomenon. I don't believe there is ANY doubt that it is NOT for our benefit. If the reason for spraying the air with unknown chemicals without our informed consent were benign, it wouldn't be SECRET!

***

I would sure like to know what "they" tell the flight crews carrying out their orders to spread these chemicals far and wide. After all, these people are spraying their own wives, children, mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers, and all their friends and acquaintenances too!

For a longer essay on this Chemtrail phenomenon, and more contrail vs. chemtrail comparison photos, please click HERE. (Large Graphic File - Long Download For Dial-Up Users)

When someone wants to argue with you that chem-trails are mere contrails, ask them "Where does all that MASS comes from then?" That's the key point in dismissing the contrail / ice crystal argument. MASS!

Imagine an old car that is burning oil due to bad piston rings. The blue cloud belching from its tailpipe IS nasty, but there isn't that much of it, and the cloud will dissipate rapidly. Can this car, by driving down one road through a small town, create a heavy blanket of smoke over the ENTIRE town? Of course not; there isn't enough MASS in that old car's exhaust. The same principle applies to chem-trails. Jet exhaust, known as a contrail, doesn't contain enough MASS to account for the phenomenon we call chemtrails.

At the end of the day, it's up to YOU to draw your own conclusions.