Chemtrails Over Sacramento

10 February 2005

Clifford E. Carnicom's DVD "Aerosol Crimes"

DVDs Now Available At Project P.R.O.V.E.!

Once again, the spray planes were at it again, just before a predicted rain storm. We did get SOME rain, but far less than was expected for that evening. We have a series of photos for you to look at, taken that day. The last is a 300% blow-up of a jet flying toward the south, leaving behind it a NORMAL contrail. This proves beyond a shadow of a doubt, that the chem-trails were not the same thing at all.

 

© 2005 Jeff Challender

These trails to my northwest.

 

© 2005 Jeff Challender

Now facing due north.

 

© 2005 Jeff Challender

This shot toward the north as well, but several minutes later.

This is the jet, flying toward the south. A 300% blow-up shows that it's trail is ordinary exhaust. There isn't enough MASS in such contrails to cause what we call chem-trails.

© 2005 Jeff Challender

***

For a longer essay on this Chemtrail phenomenon, and more contrail vs.chemtrail comparison photos, please click HERE. (Large Graphic File - Long Download For Dial-Up Users)

When someone wants to argue with you that chem-trails are mere contrails, ask them "Where does all that MASS comes from then?" That's the key point in dismissing the contrail / ice crystal argument. MASS!

Imagine an old car that is burning oil due to bad piston rings. The blue cloud belching from its tailpipe IS nasty, but there isn't that much of it, and the cloud will dissipate rapidly. Can this car, by driving down one road through a small town, create a heavy blanket of smoke over the ENTIRE town? Of course not; there isn't enough MASS in that old car's exhaust. The same principle applies to chem-trails. Jet exhaust, known as a contrail, doesn't contain enough MASS to account for the phenomenon we call chemtrails.

 

At the end of the day, it's up to YOU to draw your own conclusions.

 

© 2005 Jeff Challender