![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| STS-114 lifted off from Launch Pad 39B, Kennedy Space Center, on 26 July 2005 at 9:39 AM CDT (14:39 GMT). This daylight launch was the most watched in Shuttle history, with the possible exception of STS-1, the initial Shuttle launch on 12 April 1981. The timing and solar angle were chosen to maximise opportunities to film the liftoff, and ascent, from every possible perspective. These even included modified old jet bombers from the 1950s (WB-57 Canberras), carrying special camera turrets in the nose for the purpose of photographing Discovery at high altitude as she was on her way to orbit. The reasoning behind all of this was to make sure that if there were ANY debris strikes on the orbiter's sensitive heat shield, like the one which doomed Columbia in 2003, they would be captured on film for detailed analysis before allowing Discovery to re-enter the atmosphere. The Crew experienced some facets of Shuttle flight that are entirely new. On orbit inspection of the heat shield, manual repairs to that heat shield, and experiments with different methods of on orbit heat shield repair. In addition, Discovery carried over 15 tons of equipment and supplies to the International Space Station ( in the Raphaello MPLM module ), where she was greeted upon arrival by the Expedition 11 Crew. Three EVAs (Extra-Vehicular Activity or spacewalk) were carried out. These involved Space Station repairs, improvements, and attending to heat shield problems. A fourth EVA to repair a flaw in the insulation below Commander Eileen Collins window was cancelled as unnecessary. Space Shuttle Discovery and her crew landed safely at Edwards Air Force Base (NASA's Dryden Research Center) in the California desert at 7:11 AM CDT (12:11 GMT) on 9 August 2005. Total flight duration was 13 days 21 hours 32 minutes. The mission was highly successful, accomplishing every goal set for it. The sad news is that in the wake of continued problems with external tank insulation breaking away during liftoff, the Shuttle fleet has been indefinately grounded until the problem is solved. |
![]() |
| STS-114
Liftoff |
|
![]() |
|
| Belly
Inspection |
|
![]() |
|
| Inside
ISSy |
|
![]() |
|
| Robinson
On EVA |
|
![]() |
|
| STS-114
Landing |
THE
EVENT |
| On 1 August 2005, the Shuttle/Station complex was orbiting over Venezuela, in northern South America. The INCO seemed to notice something amongst the clouds below, and zoomed in for a better look. The first try "missed", so he backed out, moved the camera a bit, and tried again. What he found on his second go is what we call a Chemtrail pattern. |
![]() |
This is the best frame captured from the original VHS tape recorded at the time, from "live" NASA Select TV coverage of the STS-114 mission. Notice that the lines appear to enter, or go beneath, the cloud bank at top. |
This is the best frame captured from the original VHS tape recorded at the time, from "live" NASA Select TV coverage of the STS-114 mission. Notice that the lines appear to enter, or go beneath, the cloud bank at top. There is NO WAY that jet contrails would be visible from this altitude without more magnification, and MUCH better focus. Imagine something only a few feet (or meters) wide being seen from over 220 miles (350 km) distance without benefit of optical aids. I think we can also rule out the possibility that these parallel lines are natural cloud. In all my years of watching televised space flight, never have I seen a natural cloud pattern similar to this. It has been suggested that this pattern is a result of aerial spraying to destroy coca crops. That suggestion sounds reasonable on the surface but, when a little geographic fact is applied, it becomes void. Coca, the plant which upon certain processing yields cocain, is grown in the economically disadvantaged high valleys and plains of the Andes Mountain Range. These areas are primarily confined to Columbia, Peru, and Bolivia. The climate there is cool and relatively dry. Venezuela, on the other hand, is low coastal plain. It is hot tropical rain forest, and not at all suited to the cultivation of coca. A resident of Venezuela wrote to suggest that this pattern might be spray operations intended to dissipate an oil spill in Lake Maracaibo. Indeed, he indicated that this was a relatively common operation. Be that as it may, spraying of oil spills would NECESSARILY be a very LOW LEVEL operation, and highly LOCALISED! One cannot imagine that an oil spill would be dealt with from high altitude, and on such a wide scale. I think we can safely rule this out as a possibility to explain the pattern observed from space. |
| EXAMPLES
OF REAL CONTRAILS |
|
![]() |
This is what a genuine jet contrail looks like from the ground. I shot this picture from my home in February 2004. We can barely make out the jet itself. This plane is cruising at around 5 to 8 miles altitude (8 to 13 km). Visible from the height of the Space Station? Well, yes and no. Such contrails are visible if high power telescopic lenses are used. See the images below. |
![]() |
Highly magnified photo of a jet contrail as seen from a past Shuttle flight. Even with the use of telescopic lenses, the contrail 220+ miles (350+ km) below is so tiny it could be easily missed. |
| NASA
PHOTO |
|
![]() |
A second example of a jet contrail as seen from space using high powered lenses. Neither of the above in any way resemble the chemtrail pattern seen over Venezuela on 1 August 2005. Please bear in mind that these contrails were taken from the same altitude of 220+ miles (350+ km) as the chemtrail sequence. |
|
NASA
PHOTO |
|
![]() |
|
This is a weather satellite photo of a rare atmospheric phenomenon known as a "Gravity Wave". It is characterized as being like the result of a pebble thrown into a quiet pool. I had a meteorology course at University back in 1976, and this effect was not taught then. I'm given to understand that the phenomenon was first described in a peer review magazine in 1975. More on atmospheric gravity waves HERE. In comparison with the chemtrail photo from STS-114, there are great differences. As can be seen above, the gravity waves wash over the surrounding cloud masses like ocean surf over a sand castle on the beach. They cover a vast area. They are not localised, nor do they appear UNDER the prevailing cloud deck. In this writer's opinion, the above does not explain the pattern seen from space. |
|
CHEMTRAILS
OVER VENEZUELA |
![]() |
This animation depicts where the Shuttle/Station complex was when the "live" TV feed was suddenly cut off. |
![]() |
Finally, we have the actual chemtrail sequence. As one can easily see, this is a large area which has been sprayed. Note that the trails stand out even with no telescopic magnification. Remember the examples of real contrails seen from space? These are much more prominent. Some frames have been slowed down so that you may take a closer look. |
Why Venezuela? There has been political hostility on the part of the US Government (Specifically the Bush-ler Administration) toward that oil rich nation in recent times. Could there be a connection? This writer obviously cannot say. *** Another example of Chemtrails as seen from orbit is from STS-107. At all times during this incident, the camera was under the control of the INCO in Houston Mission Control. (INCO - INstrument & Communication Officer - The man in Houston Mission Control Center who is responsible for operating the Shuttle payload bay, and robotic arm, cameras. He also remotely operates the helmet cameras in space suits. In the case of ISS, this officer is referred to as the CATO - Communications And Tracking Officer. In both cases, these persons CONTROL everything which is PERMITTED to go out on broadcast to the public. It is a commonly believed falacy that the cameras are operated by Astronauts & Cosmonauts on the Shuttles, and Space Station. Very little camera work is done by the crews. They're way too busy for that.) When someone wants to argue with you that chem-trails are mere contrails, ask them "Where does all that MASS comes from then?" That's the key point in dismissing the contrail / ice crystal argument. MASS. Imagine an old car that is burning oil due to bad piston rings. The blue cloud belching from its tailpipe IS nasty, but there isn't that much of it, and the cloud will dissipate rapidly. Can this car, by driving down one road through a small town, create a heavy blanket of smoke over the ENTIRE town? Of course not; there isn't enough MASS in that old car's exhaust. The same principle applies to chem-trails. Jet exhaust, known as a contrail, doesn't contain enough MASS to account for the phenomenon we call chemtrails. For a more detailed discussion of the phenomenon, please click HERE.
At the end of the day, it's up to YOU to draw your own conclusions.
© 2005 Jeff Challender |